Wednesday, October 20, 2021

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Review

Must read

XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 210 RADEON RX 6600 SPECS

Graphics ProcessorAMD Navi 23 XT
GPU Base Clock2044 MHz
GPU Increase Clock2491 MHz
Graphics Reminiscence SortGDDR6
Graphics Reminiscence QuantityEight GB
HDMI Outputs1
DisplayPort Outputs3
VirtualLink OutputsNo
Variety of Followers2
Card Widthdouble
Card Size10.1 inches
Board Energy or TDP132 watts
Energy Connector(s)1 8-pin

Like Nvidia’s “Ampere” household (killer graphics cards, made largely of unobtanium), AMD’s Radeon RX 6000 line has been a top-down affair, with its high-end fashions launched earlier than extra inexpensive ones. In step with that pattern, the Radeon RX 6600 debuts at present, with many bunches of third-party playing cards primarily based on the GPU. We seemed on the XFX Speedster SWFT 210 ($329), making its entrance into anyone extra supply-strained graphics-card market more than ever. It decloaks on the similar introductory listing value that the EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming 12G, the primary RTX 3060 card we examined, did earlier this 12 months. The brand new AMD entry traded sufficient gaming wins and losses with that GeForce RTX 3060 to warrant its matching value in our benchmark runs. However, the RX 6600, like all RDNA-based GPUs we have examined before now few years, comes up with just a little brief inconsistency. In the present market, although the very best card is commonly merely any card you should buy without getting price-gouged, it is a good ready choice for robust gaming at 1080p (1,920 by 1,080) decision.

Suppose you’d like a GPU that may extra simply make the bounce from high-detail 1080p to 1440p play. In that case, playing cards primarily based on AMD’s Radeon RX 6600 XT or Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3060 Ti make higher monetary sense (thoughts you, in a time when there’s little of that to be discovered within the third-party card market). That stated, when you’re keen on older recreation titles, AMD’s drivers stay a core shortfall for the RX 6600 and its XT-badged larger sibling. Players who play legacy titles that use older variations of Microsoft DirectX ought to consider competing Nvidia choices as an alternative…if they will discover them.


Taking up 1080p Play With RDNA 2

current-generation GPUs, the Radeon RX 6600’s key competitor is the GeForce RTX 3060. Everyone has their strengths. Between the 2, the Radeon RX 6600 wins outright about energy draw. Consequently, these on the hunt for a lower-power, smaller-footprint card will not be dissatisfied with what the XFX card seen right here has to supply.

The XFX Speedster SWFT 210 card we now have in hand is one in every of a bunch of third-party designs primarily based on AMD’s Radeon RX 6600 GPU; AMD will not be providing an official reference model or house-brand card as Nvidia usually does. Like different RX 6000 collection GPUs, the Radeon RX 6600 is constructed on the corporate’s RDNA 2 structure and options TSMC’s 7nm lithography on a 237-square-millimeter “Navi 23 XT” die.

WE EXAMINED the XFX mannequin options 8GB of GDDR6 video reminiscence, which seems dead-on when stacked in opposition to Nvidia’s $329-MSRP GeForce RTX 3060. Let’s look at discussed standard how the whole lot else shakes out between these GPUs:

Specs In contrast: 

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (Reference)AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Reference)Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 (Reference)Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Version
StructureNaviNaviNaviAmpereAmpere
Date of IntroductionOctober 2021July 2021January 2020February 2021December 2020
Manufacturing Course of & Die Dimension7nm / 237mm27nm / 237mm27nm / 251mm28nm / 276mm28nm / 276mm2
Transistor Depend11.6 billion11.6 billion10.Three billion13.2 billion17.Four billion
Processing Cores1,792 stream processors2,048 stream processors2,304 stream processors3,584 CUDA cores4,864 CUDA cores
GPU Increase Clock2,491MHz2,589MHz1,560MHz1,777MHz1,665MHz
Video Reminiscence8GB GDDR68GB GDDR66GB GDDR612GB GDDR68GB GDDR6
Reminiscence Interface / Bandwidth128-bit / 256GBps128-bit / 256GBps192-bit / 288GBps192-bit / 360GBps256-bit / 448GBps
Board Energy132 watts160 watts150 watts170 watts200 watts
Energy ConnectorsOne eight-pinOne eight-pinOne eight-pinOne eight-pinOne eight-pin (by way of 12-pin adapter)
Beneficial Launch Worth$329$379$279$329$399

The Navi 23 XT die below the hood of the RX 6600 is, predictably, a ticked-down model of the identical GPU we noticed within the RX 6600 XT. It succeeds the AMD 279 Radeon RX 5600 XT as the brand new baseline for discrete-card RDNA consumers (the RX 5600 was OEM-only) and provides a not-small “GPU costs lately” tax of $50 to the MSRP. This represents a 17% bump from only 12 months and a half in the past, a troublesome tablet to swallow for 1080p avid gamers on funds.

The twin-slot, dual-fan XFX Speedster SWFT RX 6600 is 10.1 inches lengthy, which is more significant than many 1080p avid gamers would possibly like. Nonetheless, our test card is only one of many alternative kinds (together with single-fan choices) that shall be accessible when the RX 6600 goes on sale at present.

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Review

AMD has revealed a reference spec for this card, which the 8GB XFX Speedster SWFT 210 matches precisely, although as talked about, the chipmaker will not be producing any playing cards of its personal on this run. Many of the common third-party distributors have introduced incoming variations to select up the slack, although what accessible inventory will seem like at launch we’ll need to see.

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Review

The RX 6600 sports activities a lift clock somewhat less than 100MHz beneath the RX 6600 XT’s and barely fewer energetic stream processors, however apart from that (and the oddly particular energy necessities), the two. Playing cards share specs up and down the road.

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Review

Regarding that 132-watt energy requirement, it is pretty much lower than Nvidia’s 170-watt baseline for the GeForce RTX 3060—22% decrease, to be actual. This can be an appreciable margin. Customers attempting to construct a low-power, small-form-factor 1080p gaming machine (a well-liked construct kind for a lot of avid gamers) arguably offer the Radeon RX 6600 its most vital benefit over Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3060.

As for ports, the again of our XFX card comprises the identical customary lineup we have seen on most GPUs lining (or, moderately, broadly spaced on) the cabinets lately: three DisplayPort 1.4b outputs, one HDMI 2.1 port, and no VirtualLink.


Testing the Radeon RX 6600: Newer Video games Get the Nod

PC Labs ran the XFX Speedster SWFT 210 using a collection of DirectX 11- and 12-based artificial and real-world benchmarks. Our test rig, used for all playing cards within the charts beneath, relies on an Intel Core i9-10900K processor and employs a PCI Categorical 3.0, not 4.0, motherboard (an Asus ROG Maximus XII Hero Wi-Fi). It is geared up with 16GB of G.Ability DDR4 reminiscence and a solid-state boot drive. Given our exams with the Core i9-10900Okay and up-to-date Ryzen 9 CPUs, this platform is the very best affordable configuration for the time being to take the CPU out of the equation for body charges. 

For our testing, we targeted a few of the efforts on the Speedster’s esports side with video games like Counter-Strike: World Offensive (CS: GO) and Rainbow Six Siege. We additionally ran the cardboard using the remainder of our customary benchmark routine, which exams a GPU’s talents to deal with AAA video games on the highest doable high-quality settings, in addition to the way it rides throughout artificial benchmarks that stress the cardboard in a wide range of methods.

Nearly every test we run (apart from the esports titles) is completed on the highest possible visible high-quality preset or settings. You probably have a higher-hertz gaming monitor and are fearful your card won’t make the frame-rate grade, and it may nonetheless be doable with a mixture of decrease settings. Not solely that, however, a few of these titles (together with Demise Stranding, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, and F1 2020) have each DLSS and FidelityFX CAS with Upscaling built-in instantly into the sport. This may yield efficiency boosts of as much as 40%, relying on the setting and the cardboard you are taking part in.

And so, onward to our test outcomes. Be aware: If you wish to slim down the results beneath to a particular decision (i.e., the conclusion of the monitor you propose to make use of), click on the opposite two decision dots within the chart legends beneath to suppress them and see a single set of outcomes. Our listing of AAA titles contains a mixture of current video games in addition to some older, however nonetheless dependable, pillars of the benchmarker’s toolkit like Shadow of the Tomb Raider and Far Cry 5.

Outcomes: Artificial Benchmarks

Artificial benchmarks will be good predictors of real-world gaming efficiency. In UL’s 3DMark, the circa-2013 Fireplace Strike Extremely remains a go-to approximation of the load levied by mainstream 4K gaming. We want solely on the test’s Graphics Subscore, not the General Rating, to isolate the cardboard’s efficiency. In the meantime, we also ran 3DMark’s Time Spy Excessive, which is an efficient test of how a card will do properly, particularly in DirectX 12 video games at 4K decision video games. 3DMark’s Port Royal, till not too long ago run solely on GeForce RTX playing cards, measures how properly a GPU handles ray-tracing duties (thus the absent bars for many of the AMD Radeon playing cards). Additionally listed here are a pair of GPU-acceleration exams (Furmark and LuxMark); extra particulars on these on the “how we test” hyperlink above.

The Radeon RX 6600 is much too low on the ability totem pole to be thought of for any severe rendering or manufacturing duties. Its 3DMark and Superposition outcomes supplied a merely okay relative begin for the cardboard in any other case.

The GeForce RTX 3060 beat the RX 6600 in 4 out of 5 of those artificial runs, with the AMD card pulling barely forward solely in Fireplace Strike Extremely. Let’s examine if those narrative adjustments as we transfer to precise AAA video games.

Outcomes: Latest AAA Video games

For the next real-world video games, we sometimes benchmark utilizing the highest-quality preset and, if accessible, DirectX 12.

True to type, AMD’s drivers threw a pair of curveballs into our outcomes. Although the general pattern of the Radeon RX 6600 being only a tad slower than Nvidia’s RTX 3060 continued, there have been exceptions reminiscent of Murderer’s Creed: Odyssey, the place the XFX RX 6600 outpaced each the RTX 3060 and the RX 6600 XT.

We have not retested the Radeon RX 6600 XT since its launch; however, given AMD’s track record with RDNA 2 driver stability, we’ll assume the win for the weaker card may very well be chalked as much as a driver tweaks for the reason that RX 6600 XT debuted. Whereas its AAA gaming roughly matched our expectations of the RX 6600 falling simply barely behind the RTX 3060, each playing card is nonetheless overshadowed by the worth/efficiency ratio of the stellar $399 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition.

Outcomes: Multiplayer Video games

Although we max out the attention sweet in most PC Labs’ recreation exams to push playing cards to their restrict, multiplayer gaming is all about sustaining the very best steadiness between graphical constancy and body price. With that in thought, we have stored CS: GO, Rainbow Six Siege, and Last Fantasy 14 tuned to the optimum mixture of mandatory enhancements in settings (larger anti-aliasing and decrease shadows, as an example), whereas nonetheless attempting to maintain 1080p body charges above 144fps.

Why 144fps? That is a coveted goal for aggressive esports avid gamers who’ve high-refresh-rate 120Hz or 144Hz (or sooner) gaming monitors. For extra informal gamers with peculiar 60Hz shows, a stable 80fps or 90fps at your goal decision, with some overhead to account for dips beneath 60fps, is ok.

Although it might appear as if the baseline of what we should always anticipate spending on a 1080p or 1440p gaming engine has risen sharply over the previous two years (and it has), in lots of situations that are as a result of GPUs made for avid multiplayer gamers have needed to maintain efficiency tempo with an equally sharp rise in monitor refresh charges. At the moment, the quickest monitor you should buy is the Editors’ Alternative award-winning Acer Nitro XV252Q F, which prices $499.99 and tops out at an eye-widening 390Hz at 1080p. To profit from this show, a card wants to have the ability to energy in style titles like CS: GO and Rainbow Six Siege at the least 390fps to maximize the funding.

So when you had been to mix that refresh price with the Radeon RX 6600, would you’ve got a card that would cling in there? All the time that is dependent upon the sport and the settings. In Counter-Strike, you may discover simply sufficient clearance; however, Rainbow Six would possibly want various element settings dialed down to succeed in that lofty objective.

As for Last Fantasy XIV, regardless of the number of restarts and a second driver wipe for sanity, we could not get that benchmark to run at any decision on the Radeon RX 6600. Different AMD and Nvidia playing cards booted the standard excellent; however, the current driver set invariably crashed to the desktop on initialization. MMO gamers, be cautious!

Outcomes: Legacy AAA Titles

We additionally ran some fast exams on some oldies-but-goodies that also provide a pleasing AAA gaming expertise. These legacy exams embrace runs of Tomb Raider (2013), Sleeping Canines, and Bioshock: Infinite.

If you had been maintaining our AMD protection since the launch of RDNA 1 again in 2019, nothing about these outcomes ought to shock you. Nicely, it is shocking that there nonetheless hasn’t been an enhancement launched all this time later; however, regardless, AMD’s observed report for uneven outcomes with older video games like these stays constant. All three video games we test that use older APIs like DirectX 11 proceed to be thorns in AMD’s aspect, displaying significantly slower outcomes (in some instances lower than half as quick) as competing Nvidia playing cards on a similar value.

We have tested more legacy games on an array of cards and located the issue is persistent all through the RDNA 1 and RDNA 2 stack and has but to be solved as of October 2021. If your predominant PC-game squeezes are older DirectX 11 video games, be warned that the Radeon RX 6600 probably will not present price-competitive efficiency until AMD addresses older video games.


Overclocking and Thermals: Scorching Beneath the Collar

Onward to temperature-testing and overclocking the cardboard. We subjected the XFX Speedster SWFT 210 to a 10-minute stress test in 3DMark Port Royal, and the cardboard peaked at a temperature of 67 levels C.

That is excessive for a card at this energy tier, particularly contemplating the Gigabyte-branded RX 6600 XT’s results of simply 59 levels C in the identical test.

Most of this warmth was collected and dumped into the center of the backplate in response to what we noticed utilizing a FLIR One Pro thermal imaging digicam geared toward our testbed in the course of the stress test.

When it was observed to overclock the cardboard utilizing AMD’s Radeon Software utility, I couldn’t obtain any secure overclock profile that produced beneficial outcomes. The cardboard was fairly crash-prone throughout this testing, and it took a bit extra tuning than traditional simply to get it off the overclocking beginning line. From there, we had been ready to add a couple of dozen megahertz to the utmost enhance and reminiscence clocks; however, something that would have added a noticeable real-world efficiency carry would crash the cardboard outright.


The Verdict: Extra Meals in a Famine

The breadth of accessible GPUs to select from on this value tier is concurrently turning into broader but extra granular than ever. As a 1080p engine that may additionally dip its toes comfortably into powering many AAA and multiplayer video games at 1440p, the XFX Speedster SWFT 210 is a decent outing that exhibits a weak spot with older video games, like different current AMD Radeon efforts.

Our testing discovered that the 132-watt AMD Radeon RX 6600 commonly trades off wins and losses with the 170-watt Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060, relying on the title and backbone. Given the matching MSRPs, the primary function promoting factors for the Nvidia GPU is its Tensor cores and growing library of DLSS-exclusive games.

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Review

Nicely…and its GeForce drivers. AMD’s drivers proved extra uneven in our legacy recreation testing, with an entirely new bug this time around prevented any testing in Last Fantasy XIV completely.

As a straight competitor to the RX 6600 XT, the RX 6600’s worth proposition muddies a bit. Regardless of solely being 15% cheaper than the RX 6600 XT at listing value, the RX 6600 was roughly 25% slower in lots of 1080p and 1440p AAA and multiplayer video games. The identical rang true in opposition to Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (a card that had no downside operating each model of DirectX we threw its manner at total energy).

Until AMD pushes an extra aggressive driver set, we will not advocate the Radeon RX 6600 over the RTX 3060. Nonetheless, we additionally know what the GPU stock situation is like on the market. So long as you do not plan on spending most of your PC gaming observe to time with older titles, the RX 6600 will do the job in its value zone. Plus, it might be extra available at or near precise MSRP when RX 6600 playing cards launch. Hold these fingers crossed…and poised over your Purchase buttons at launch.


You can also checkout

More articles

Disclosure: Written and researched by GetGear.tech. We spotlight services and products you would possibly find interestingWhen you purchase them, we might get a small share of the revenue from the sale from our companions. We might obtain merchandise freed from cost from producers to test. This doesn't drive our choice as as to if or not a product is featured or advisable. We function independently from our promoting workforce. We welcome your suggestions. E-mail us at [email protected].

When you buy through our links, we may earn some money from our affiliate partners. Learn more.

Latest article

DIG DEEPER WITH RELATED posts