Friday, September 17, 2021

Your Laundry Sheds Harmful Microfibers. Here’s What You Can Do About It

Must read

My glad place is that chaotic zone of salt and sprays the place the seaside meets the ocean, a spot of coming and going, flux and change. I like to dig my toes into the suctioning sand and really feel the swirl of a receding wave. Although typically my ft discover sharp issues within the tender sand—not simply gravel and pebbles but additionally, more and more and overwhelmingly, plastic. I attempt to gather the shards, the bits of aquas, whites, and teals, however quickly I hand over, indignant and defeated. There may be an excessive amount of. A lot of it’s too tiny to carry and even see.

These tiny items are referred to as microplastics, and so they measure less than 5 millimeters (PDF) in size (or, smaller than the width of a #2 pencil). Microplastics are ubiquitous now—on the Jersey Shore of my childhood, in Hawaii and Japan (the place my households dwell), and in California, my new dwelling. There may be almost nowhere on earth that plastics haven’t been discovered, not even within the depths of the ocean. In October 2020, scientists in Australia printed a study estimating that 9.25 to 15.86 million tons of microplastics will be discovered on the ocean ground. Or, as The New York Occasions reported: “18 to 24 buying baggage stuffed with small plastic fragments for each foot of shoreline on each continent besides Antarctica.”

The human world runs on plastic, and microplastics come from a wide range of sources: bigger items of plastic (like bottles) that break aside into smaller and smaller fragments, automotive tires, plastic beads (together with these in skin-care merchandise), and artificial fibers. We now know that clothes, bedding, and different textiles shed microplastics in fiber kind and (together with tire degradation and highway runoff) are the main contributors to world plastic air pollution. These microfibers, which are stripped and carried off by friction and turbulence within the washer, enter our wastewater, ultimately ending up within the atmosphere.

The examination of microfiber air pollution is comparatively new. Simply 10 years in the past, a gaggle of scientists printed a breakthrough study of shorelines on six continents; it pointed to laundry as a major supply of plastic air pollution on this planet’s oceans. Particularly, the examine discovered plastic microfibers—tiny polyester and acrylic threads that matched these in textiles. As we speak scientists estimate that textiles produce 35% of the microplastic air pollution on this planet’s oceans (within the type of artificial microfibers), which might make textiles the most important recognized supply of marine microplastic air pollution. That’s about 2.2 million tons of microfibers coming into the ocean yearly.

“Now we have a plastic air pollution disaster,” mentioned Alexis Jackson, a marine biologist, and scientist with the California chapter of the Nature Conservancy, an environmental advocacy group. “The face of that disaster appears to be like loads completely different [than we thought]. It’s not simply plastic baggage and soda bottles. It’s all of those microplastics that you would be able to see with the bare eye which can be pervasive within the atmosphere.”

To handle the microfiber air pollution drawback, a couple of merchandise have cropped up that declare to maintain microplastics out of wastewater once you wash your garments. The Guppyfriend laundry bag and the Cora Ball are two of the better-known choices. Girlfriend Collective—which makes one of our leggings picks from recycled polyester sourced partially from recycled PET (polyethylene terephthalate) bottles—now sells a microplastics filter that you just connect to your washer (albeit with some issue, in line with evaluations). Although this merchandise won’t singlehandedly solve the massive global problem of microplastic pollution, it could increase consciousness and assist cut back wastewater air pollution on a personal scale.

I ordered a couple of those filters to view them firsthand, and I’ve used a few of them in current weeks. For now, we are able to give authoritative recommendations about which of those choices is the “finest.” There are various components affecting the efficiency of those filters, akin to washing-machine kind, the dimensions, and make-up of a laundry load, the detergent, and the wash cycle. Additionally, there isn’t a variety of competitors for microfiber filters, particularly for ones accessible in the USA. To make issues extra difficult, there’s not but a standardized, peer-reviewed metric or certification for evaluating the claims of those filters, as there may be for, say, water filters. Though a handful of scientific research has, in contrast, the effectiveness of among the filters on the market, the results vary based mostly on methodology and variables like a washing-machine mannequin, material kind, and detergent. And as two specialists individually instructed me, it’s vital to do not forget that “there’s no silver bullet” answer. Nonetheless, there are issues you are able to do to cut back microplastics’ air pollution once you wash your garments.

I set about attempting to know the issue that units just like the Guppyfriend and the Cora Ball are designed to resolve, in addition to what to remember whereas weighing potential options.

The place do plastic microfibers come from?

The yarns in our clothes are made up of filaments that can be twisted collectively. Throughout washing, with the consequences of water, friction and abrasion, and detergents, these filaments shed. Various kinds of material shed greater than others. A tightly woven material with tightly twisted yarn (one which feels flat and {smooth}) sheds lower than a loosely woven material with loosely twisted yarn (one which feels fluffy or fuzzy). “Every little thing from the standard of the uncooked materials enter to the standard of the processing equipment to the talent and experience of the mill goes to have an effect on the standard of a material and due to this fact it’s shedding,” mentioned Stephanie Karba, an environmental researcher on the outdoor-clothing maker Patagonia. “We’ve additionally discovered that partnering with an excellent mill and dealing with a high-quality yarn can result in a stronger, extra sturdy material that sheds much less.”

Patagonia, which has staked its tent on sustainability claims, has a motive to get forward of this: Research presents that artificial fleece will be one of many largest shedders. To additional cut back microfiber shedding, Patagonia recommends spot-cleaning its fleece more often than not.

Four different colored rolls of fleece fabric side by side.

Amongst materials, artificial fleece is likely one of the largest microfiber shedders in the laundry. Picture: Eugene Sergeev/iStock

One potential answer to the microplastics drawback is to purchase clothes made with pure fibers—reasonably than polyester and nylon—each time potential. However “the change to pure clothes, which is likely one of the most promoted options [to the microfiber pollution problem] that I’ve seen, isn’t actually an answer as a result of it’s not that easy,” mentioned Sam Athey, an environmental chemist and Ph.D. candidate on the College of Toronto Rochman Lab. She explained that even textiles labeled “100% pure” can comprise as much as 30% chemical additive by weight, typically utilized for stain resistance, water repellency, fireplace retardancy, and antimicrobial properties. Until a garment says it’s fully untreated, “due to points with transparency within the textile business, you don’t all the time know what chemical substances your clothes accommodate.”

“The priority is that not solely are these chemical substances poisonous in themselves and that these fibers could act as transport vectors to hold the chemical substances to the atmosphere, however, these chemical substances also can have an effect on how lengthy these fibers are within the atmosphere so that they delay their persistence. One of many large issues with plastics is that they final so lengthy within the atmosphere. Nicely, in case you change these pure fibers to make them extra persistent within the atmosphere, in addition, they grow to be an issue,” Athey mentioned.

Because of this, reasonably than simply switching to “pure” fibers and calling it a day, it is smart to seek out methods to cut back microfiber shedding in the laundry. And laundry isn’t the one wrongdoer. We now know that our clothes shed microfibers just about consistently, simply by being worn. Though scientists first discovered artificial microfibers within the ocean (which pulled the main focus to the effect of laundry), more modern research now reveals that our garments shed nearly as many microfibers into the air.

However for a lot of people, it’s simpler and extra sensible to seize microfiber air pollution by altering laundry practices than by, say, going nude. So we’re specializing in what occurs within the wash.

The place do the fibers in our garments find themselves?

Wastewater remedy is efficient at catching microfibers that come out within the wash; some can seize as much as 98% of them. However studies present that because of the enormous quantity of water {that a} wastewater remedy plant processes day by day, a major quantity—65 million microplastics per heart per day, in line with one study—nonetheless makes its approach into the atmosphere. As soon as there, the microplastics transfer up the marine meals chain or are taken up into crops via soil. Since microplastics don’t biodegrade and are unattainable to get better as soon as launched into habitats, the issue is barely rising.

Even these microfibers that water remedy does seize could find themselves again within the atmosphere, as occurs in California, in line with a forthcoming examination of microfiber air pollution by the Nature Conservancy and UC Santa Barbara. In that state, biosolids captured throughout the water remedy could also unfold on agricultural land as fertilizer. Alexis Jackson, a marine biologist and collaborator on the examination, mentioned that via this analysis, family “filtration expertise really proved to be more practical within the close to time period.” It is because irrespective of how efficient a remedy heart is, “in the event that they’re taking these byproducts and placing them on land, you grow to be more practical at placing that pollutant [back] into the atmosphere.”

As we speak scientists estimate that textiles produce 35% of the microplastic air pollution on this planet’s oceans (within the type of artificial microfibers), which might make textiles the most important recognized supply of marine microplastic air pollution.

Regardless of the pathway, plastic microfibers from garments have proven up in meals, in addition to in bottled water, tap water, beer, and sea salt (PDF). An American Chemical Society study printed in 2019 reported that “our estimates of American consumption of microplastics are probably drastic underestimates.” Scientists are still studying the health impacts of ingesting plastic—together with on the immune system and in childhood growth. However we do know that we’re all being uncovered to plastic consistently. (As a result of no requirements for microplastics at the moment exist from the American Nationwide Requirements Institute, ANSI, or NSF Worldwide—two of our bodies that oversee product declare necessities—none of our water filter picks are licensed for microplastic filtration.)

The microfibers that our clothes shed could have vital penalties for ecosystems in water and on land, in addition, to instantly on our well-being—the extent of which scientists are just beginning to understand. Now we have a serious environmental drawback, and it’s linked to our garments—how we design them, how we make them, how typically we purchase them, and the way we look after them. “The worldwide manufacturing of stretchy artificial textiles is predicted to triple by 2050,” mentioned Jackson. “So it is a drawback that’s not going away.”

Do laundry filters assist?

There are two sorts of filters that you would be able to purchase to handle microfiber shedding in the laundry. The primary is a filter that you add to your washing machine’s water outflow, to catch fibers earlier than they enter municipal wastewater. The second is an adjunct you throw within the wash alongside along with your garments, akin to laundry balls that seize microfibers or laundry bags comprised of woven monofilaments with a small pore measurement.

Do they assist? The quick reply is perhaps. A handful of studies (one of which was supported by clothes model Eileen Fisher) show that each in-drum and exterior microfiber filter cut back microfiber air pollution within the wastewater system to various extents. Each sort requires periodic cleansing to take away the stuff that builds up, and people fibers have to be thrown within the trash—not washed down the sink—to really divert plastics from wastewater. (After all, that plastic will then find itself in landfills and, over time, could leach chemical substances again into the atmosphere. There isn’t any good answer.)

In the meantime, there are no standardized methods or metrics for evaluating these units, and that is why we are able to advocate a decision or definitively level to at least one we believe most. “Quantifying microfiber launch from clothes is advanced,” mentioned Imogen Napper, an analysis fellow on the College of Plymouth who co-authored a study in 2020 evaluating the effectiveness of six microfiber filtration units. “It may be doubtlessly impacted by temperature, use of detergent or conditioner, kind of washer, kind of clothes washed and their polymer kind.” Scientific findings can also differ from firm numbers, which isn’t essentially a trigger for mistrust; that is to be anticipated if there is no such thing as a constant testing methodology.

That mentioned, not all units are equal. They differ in ease of use, value per life cycle, transparency, and evidence-based backing. What works finest is in the end the gadget that has at the least one third-party take a look at behind it and that meets your way of life and wishes.

Exterior microfiber filters: pricier up entrance, require set up

A microfiber filter that you just connect to the surface of your washer could also be a possibility. It is going to require extra effort than simply utilizing a laundry bag or comparable accent. However aside from attaching the filter and emptying it each two to 10 loads (relying on the filter and what you wash), you received’t want to regulate the way you do laundry (as you would possibly when utilizing laundry baggage or balls). Most filters are cumbersome, nevertheless, so you have to ensure you have sufficient room for the filter you select (and, in case you hire, have approval out of your landlord). For instance, Filtrol ($140 on the time of writing) is 15 inches tall and 9 inches vast, and it needs to be put in with 1 to 2 ft of clearance above the filter (to enter it for cleansing). Another choice, LUV-R ($180 on the time of writing) is analogous in measurement, at about 13 inches tall and 10 inches vast, and it requires 16 to 18 inches of prime clearance.

The Girlfriend Collective Microfiber Filter is cheaper ($45 on the time of writing). However, the worth doesn’t embrace the eight additional parts (PDF) you need to supply by yourself. Relying on your persona, you might discover sourcing these elements (like a hose, which the Filtrol and the LUV-R kits embrace) to be an “unbelievable trouble,” as one current reviewer noticed on Girlfriend Collective’s website. Now we have not but tried the filter we bought, however one Wirecutter staffer is planning to put in it, and we’ll replace this piece with the outcomes.

The Girlfriend Collective filter needs to be hooked up (with some effort) to the surface of your washer to seize microfibers that can be shed within the wash. Picture: Girlfriend Collective

When used appropriately, the LUV-R has been shown in tests to reduce microfibers. But it surely’s troublesome to definitively say how efficient this gadget is, given the shortage of standardized strategies. A 2020 study by scientists with the Worldwide Marine Litter Analysis Unit, on the College of Plymouth, discovered that the LUV-R decreased microfibers in wastewater by 29%, plus or minus 15%. However, another study printed the identical 12 months discovered that the LUV-R decreased shedding by 74%. (Each research sought to imitate family laundry practices.) Neither examination included the Filtrol in testing, so it can’t be in contrast. Of six units examined within the study, XFiltra (anticipated to grow to be accessible quickly) was discovered to be the simplest filter (a 78% discount). Girlfriend Collective doesn’t share its filter’s effectiveness. However in line with its website, the corporate is working with a 3rd get-together to supply a seize charge.

Laundry baggage and balls: moveable and able to exit the field (with some limitations)

You probably have a restricted area around your washer or setup that feels like an excessive amount of of a DIY undertaking, otherwise, you hire, do laundry at a laundromat, or are on tighter funds, you might favor a microfiber bag (which you fill along with your clothes and toss within the machine) or a laundry ball (which works into the drum along with your load).

Laundry baggage and laundry balls value lower than exterior filters, however, they don’t essentially prevent cash in the long term. Anticipate spending between $20 to $40 per merchandise. The Guppyfriend laundry bag (roughly 29 by 20 inches) is about $35, the Wolven bag (roughly 28 by 20 inches) is $24, and the Cora Ball is $38 (all costs on the time of writing). Nonetheless, you’ll probably want multiple bag. Alexander Nolte, co-founder of Guppyfriend, instructed me that the corporate recommends utilizing two baggage per wash cycle, to keep away from overstuffing the bag. For efficient cleansing and to stability the wash cycle, every bag ought to ideally be crammed to two-thirds its quantity (what I estimated to be about 15 grownup T-shirts). This basically doubles the associated fee to you. There isn’t any restrict to the quantity of clothes per load you’ll be able to wash with the Cora Ball. Nonetheless, the corporate does counsel including as much as two extra balls in case you discover many fibers being caught in a single wash cycle.

Laundry baggage

Laundry baggage just like the Guppyfriend work similar to different wash-cycle laundry baggage: You fill the bag along with your clothes and toss it into the washer. Picture: Guppyfriend

In case you are contemplating getting a laundry bag, there are a couple of microfiber baggage accessible, the commonest being the Guppyfriend. It’s made with woven monofilament, a single polyamide filament, just like fishing line, that doesn’t disintegrate into fibers the best way yarn does. The fabric provides it a {smooth}, nearly slippery, windbreaker-like really feel. It’s bought instantly via the web site, in addition to via outside retailers like Patagonia and REI. As do different wash-cycle laundry baggage (even people who don’t declare to cut back microplastic air pollution), the Guppyfriend protects delicates within the wash. Most likely as a result of it has been accessible the longest, since 2017, the Guppyfriend appears to even be probably the most robustly examined and researched bag of any of its rivals. The 2020 University of Plymouth study discovered that the Guppyfriend decreased microfibers by 54%. But, as with every gadget, the precise discount will differ based mostly on the variables of your machine, the sort and amount of laundry, the detergent, and the cycle, amongst different components.

Different laundry baggage, just like the Wolven bag, carefully resemble the Guppyfriend and have comparable sizing, however there may be not as a lot scientific proof accessible from third events to assist their claims. Will Ryan, the “chief dreamer” of Wolven (a 1% for the Planet firm that sells OEKO-TEX–licensed material), mentioned in an e mail that the corporate designed its nylon bag with the identical producer “that claims to provide the Guppyfriend.” I seen that the Guppyfriend was off-white out of the field, but the Wolven bag was a brighter white shade and had a barely less-smooth really feel than the Guppyfriend. Once I requested about this distinction, the spokesperson responded, “I can’t be 100% sure that it’s the identical producer and materials, however the producer claimed that it was, and once we initially in contrast them we didn’t really feel a distinction. Possibly they’ve modified their bag materials extra not too long ago. Sorry that I can’t be extra sure.” Coming from an organization with transparency certifications, this reply struck me as a crimson flag. However maybe it’s indicative of the challenges dealing with transparency in textiles. This doesn’t essentially imply that the Wolven baggage don’t work, however we are able to’t advocate their effectiveness at lowering microfiber shedding. (Mine did unzip two of the thrice I used it within the wash, nevertheless, which didn’t occur with the Guppyfriend.)

Laundry balls

A closeup of a person placing a Cora Ball laundry ball in a washing machine filled with colorful clothing.

The Cora Ball goes instantly into the wash with the load. In contrast to laundry baggage, which defend clothes, this gadget could snag on unfastened knits or lace materials and injury delicate clothes. Picture: Cora Ball

The Cora Ball is the one laundry ball I discovered that’s commercially accessible and marketed towards the microplastics drawback. It’s a grapefruit-sized, pine-cone-like plastic orb whose spines are capped with tender, doughnut-shaped plastic discs to guard your garments from snagging. Within the University of Plymouth study, of the six units examined, the Cora Ball was the third handiest, lowering microfibers by about 31%, versus 54% for the Guppyfriend. Since neither gadget is ideal however each have been proven in testing to cut back microfiber shedding into wastewater, it might be extra vital to think about what you wash—and the way.

The corporate does not recommend utilizing the Cora Ball with lace materials or unfastened knits as a result of it will possibly snag on threads and injury delicate clothes, and the corporate states that gadgets with straps, like bras, could wind their approach across the ball. I haven’t but examined the Cora Ball, however simply holding it, I noticed it has sufficient toothy elements that I’d be nervous to make use of it for delicates. (I’ve personally gravitated towards utilizing the Guppyfriend over the Cora Ball, as a result of I take advantage of it with athletic put on and different delicates. I’ve not tried to make use of each collectively since neither product was designed for use in tandem, and it’s unclear whether or not the agitation from the Cora Ball may have an effect on the efficiency of a laundry bag.)

Different issues to think about

Simply as with the exterior microfiber filters, you’ll want to scrub the laundry baggage or the Cora Ball, however how often you do that will range. Over time, bigger strands like hair and pet fur, in addition to tiny fibers, will begin to accumulate within the spines of the Cora Ball or the seams of the bag. In some unspecified time in the future, that build-up needs to be eliminated and disposed of within the trash. Some reviewers have discovered cleansing these units to be annoying. For these with restricted dexterity or mobility, cleansing across the seams or plastic spines could also be extra-frustrating or unattainable.

Guppyfriend claims its bag will face up to at the least 50 washes (or only a sixth of what Power Star estimates the common US family washes in a 12 months). Nolte claims Guppyfriend will probably last more if washed as directed, with chilly water. Cora Ball does not suggest changing its gadget after a set variety of makes use of, though the corporate does provide free spindle replacement for the primary 12 months.

All the units accessible—each exterior filters and in-drum baggage and balls—are both largely or 100% plastic in some kind. And, in the USA at the least, as a result of these plastics are classified as “different,” they will be difficult, if not impossible, to recycle. (Guppyfriend recommends recycling the bag in Germany, the place recycling practices are completely different. Cora Ball claims that its plastic is 100% recyclable, however US recycling practices make this extra complicated.) I didn’t discover any research evaluating the quantity of plastic these units contribute to landfill versus what they’re in a position to divert from wastewater all through their life cycles. As of now, neither Cora Ball nor Guppyfriend gives a product reclamation program.

What are you able to do with no filter?

Everybody I spoke with for this piece confused that the plastic microfiber drawback can’t be solved by people alone, and that it’ll require modifications throughout scales and industries. A few of these modifications are being mentioned on the state or federal stage. California’s legislature, for instance, is considering a invoice that might determine and ultimately require efficient microfiber filtration in laundry amenities. In February 2020, France turned the primary nation to require that, by 2025, new washing machines will have the ability to filter microplastics. And in March 2021 Australia introduced, in its National Plastics Plan (PDF), a phase-in of such filters in business and residential washers by July 2030. Even so, Jackson mentioned, the affect of particular person practices “shouldn’t be underestimated.”

The specialists I spoke with prompt a couple of techniques. A few of them are intuitive, like doing laundry much less typically and lowering the amount of water you utilize in proportion to material (as a result of research counsel that extra water causes extra microfiber shedding). This implies you must wash full hundreds when potential and—surprisingly—keep away from delicates settings, since delicates cycles use extra water however much less agitation. Consultants additionally counsel utilizing front-loading washing machines, since they’re discovered to trigger much less shedding than top-loading fashions, and to line-dry your garments when potential. Guppyfriend advises washing on chilly—recommendation that’s echoed elsewhere. Sam Athey washes with chilly water however mentioned the impact of heat water temps on microfiber shedding doesn’t have ample scientific proof. “I do know there’s not good scientific consensus to say that chilly water washes cut back microfiber loss throughout laundry, however on the identical time, I do know that chilly water washes are higher for fluid power consumption and that low quantity washes are good for water consumption. So different environmental impacts issue into my practices as effectively.”

Although all of this can be overwhelming, Athey prompt taking a practical, multi-pronged method to doing laundry. “One answer isn’t going to work for everybody. … It’s good to know what options are on the market and contemplate adopting multiple.”

So, what are you able to do to cut back microfiber air pollution?

  • Do laundry much less typically.
  • Wash full hundreds.
  • Keep away from delicates settings in your machine.
  • Line-dry your garments when potential.
  • Think about putting in a filter in your washer or utilizing a laundry bag or laundry ball.
  • When it’s time to purchase a brand new washer, go for a front-loading mannequin.

Sources:

My happy place is that chaotic zone of salt and spray where the beach meets the sea, a place of coming and going, flux and exchange. I love to dig my toes into the suctioning sand and feel the swirl of a receding wave. Though often my feet find sharp things in the soft sand—not just gravel and pebbles but also, increasingly and overwhelmingly, plastic. I try to collect the shards, the bits of aquas, whites, and teals, but soon I give up, angry and defeated. There is too much. So much of it is too tiny to hold or even see.

These tiny pieces are called microplastics, and they measure less than 5 millimeters (PDF) in length (or, smaller than the width of a #2 pencil). Microplastics are ubiquitous now—at the Jersey Shore of my childhood, in Hawaii and Japan (where my families live), and in California, my new home. There is almost nowhere on earth that plastics haven’t been found, not even in the depths of the ocean. In October 2020, scientists in Australia published a study estimating that 9.25 to 15.86 million tons of microplastics can be found on the ocean floor. Or, as The New York Times reported: “18 to 24 shopping bags full of small plastic fragments for every foot of coastline on every continent except Antarctica.”

The human world runs on plastic, and microplastics come from a variety of sources: larger pieces of plastic (like bottles) that break apart into smaller and smaller fragments, car tires, plastic beads (including those in skin-care products), and synthetic fibers. We now know that clothing, bedding, and other textiles shed microplastics in fiber form and (along with tire degradation and road runoff) are major contributors to global plastic pollution. These microfibers, which are stripped and carried off by friction and turbulence in the washing machine, enter our wastewater, eventually ending up in the environment.

The study of microfiber pollution is relatively new. Just 10 years ago, a group of scientists published a breakthrough study of shorelines on six continents; it pointed to laundry as a significant source of plastic pollution in the world’s oceans. Specifically, the study found plastic microfibers—tiny polyester and acrylic threads that matched those in textiles. Today scientists estimate that textiles produce 35% of the microplastic pollution in the world’s oceans (in the form of synthetic microfibers), which would make textiles the largest known source of marine microplastic pollution. That’s about 2.2 million tons of microfibers entering the ocean every year.

“We have a plastic pollution crisis,” said Alexis Jackson, a marine biologist and scientist with the California chapter of the Nature Conservancy, an environmental advocacy organization. “The face of that crisis looks a lot different [than we thought]. It’s not just plastic bags and soda bottles. It’s all of these microplastics that you can’t see with the naked eye that are pervasive in the environment.”

To address the microfiber pollution problem, a few products have cropped up that claim to keep microplastics out of wastewater when you wash your clothes. The Guppyfriend laundry bag and the Cora Ball are two of the better-known options. Girlfriend Collective—which makes one of our leggings picks from recycled polyester sourced partially from recycled PET (polyethylene terephthalate) bottles—now sells a microplastics filter that you attach to your washing machine (albeit with some difficulty, according to reviews). Though these products won’t singlehandedly solve the massive global problem of microplastic pollution, they may raise awareness and help reduce wastewater pollution on an individual scale.

I ordered a few of these filters to view them firsthand, and I’ve used a couple of them in recent weeks. For now, we can’t give authoritative advice about which of these options is the “best.” There are many factors affecting the performance of these filters, such as washing-machine type, the size and makeup of a laundry load, the detergent, and the wash cycle. Also, there isn’t a lot of competition for microfiber filters, especially for ones available in the United States. To make things more complicated, there’s not yet a standardized, peer-reviewed metric or certification for comparing the claims of these filters, as there is for, say, water filters. Although a handful of scientific studies have compared the effectiveness of some of the filters out there, the results vary based on methodology and variables like washing-machine model, fabric type, and detergent. And as two experts separately told me, it’s important to remember that “there’s no silver bullet” solution. Nonetheless, there are things you can do to reduce microplastics pollution when you wash your clothes.

I set about trying to understand the problem that devices like the Guppyfriend and the Cora Ball are designed to solve, as well as what to keep in mind while weighing potential solutions.

Where do plastic microfibers come from?

The yarns in our clothing are made up of filaments that are twisted together. During washing, with the effects of water, friction and abrasion, and detergents, those filaments shed. Different types of fabric shed more than others. A tightly woven fabric with tightly twisted yarn (one that feels flat and smooth) sheds less than a loosely woven fabric with loosely twisted yarn (one that feels fluffy or fuzzy). “Everything from the quality of the raw material input to the quality of the processing machinery to the skill and expertise of the mill is going to affect the quality of a fabric and therefore its shedding,” said Stephanie Karba, an environmental researcher at the outdoor-clothing maker Patagonia. “We’ve also found that partnering with a very good mill and working with a high-quality yarn can lead to a stronger, more durable fabric that sheds less.”

Patagonia, which has staked its tent on sustainability claims, has reason to get ahead of this: Studies show that synthetic fleece can be one of the biggest shedders. To further reduce microfiber shedding, Patagonia recommends spot-cleaning its fleece most of the time.

Four different colored rolls of fleece fabric side by side.
Among fabrics, synthetic fleece is one of the biggest microfiber shedders in laundry. Photo: eugenesergeev/iStock

One potential solution to the microplastics problem is to buy clothing made with natural fibers—rather than polyester and nylon—whenever possible. But “the switch to natural clothing, which is one of the most promoted solutions [to the microfiber pollution problem] that I’ve seen, is not really a solution because it’s not that simple,” said Sam Athey, an environmental chemist and PhD candidate at the University of Toronto Rochman Lab. She explained that even textiles labeled “100% natural” can contain up to 30% chemical additive by weight, often applied for stain resistance, water repellency, fire retardancy, and antimicrobial properties. Unless a garment says it is completely untreated, “because of issues with transparency in the textile industry, you don’t always know what chemicals your clothing contains.”

“The concern is that not only are those chemicals toxic in themselves, and that these fibers may act as transport vectors to carry the chemicals to the environment, but these chemicals can also affect how long these fibers are in the environment, so they prolong their persistence. One of the big problems with plastics is that they last so long in the environment. Well, if you change these natural fibers to make them more persistent in the environment, they also become a problem,” Athey said.

For this reason, rather than just switching to “natural” fibers and calling it a day, it makes sense to find ways to reduce microfiber shedding in laundry. And laundry isn’t the only culprit. We now know that our clothing sheds microfibers pretty much constantly, just by being worn. Although scientists first found synthetic microfibers in the ocean (which pulled the focus to the impact of laundry), more recent research now shows that our clothes shed almost as many microfibers into the air.

But for many individuals, it’s easier and more practical to capture microfiber pollution by changing laundry practices than by, say, going nude. So we’re focusing on what happens in the wash.

Where do the fibers in our clothes end up?

Wastewater treatment is effective at catching microfibers that come out in the wash; some can capture as much as 98% of them. But studies show that due to the huge volume of water that a wastewater treatment plant processes daily, a significant amount—65 million microplastics per center per day, according to one study—still makes its way into the environment. Once there, the microplastics move up the marine food chain or are taken up into crops through soil. Since microplastics do not biodegrade and are impossible to recover once released into habitats, the problem is only growing.

Even those microfibers that water treatment does capture may end up back in the environment, as happens in California, according to a forthcoming study of microfiber pollution by the Nature Conservancy and UC Santa Barbara. In that state, biosolids captured during water treatment may be spread on agricultural land as fertilizer. Alexis Jackson, a marine biologist and collaborator on the study, said that through this research, household “filtration technology actually proved to be more effective in the near term.” This is because no matter how effective a treatment center is, “if they’re taking those byproducts and putting them on land, you become more effective at putting that pollutant [back] into the environment.”

Today scientists estimate that textiles produce 35% of the microplastic pollution in the world’s oceans (in the form of synthetic microfibers), which would make textiles the largest known source of marine microplastic pollution.

No matter the pathway, plastic microfibers from clothes have shown up in food, as well as in bottled watertap water, beer, and sea salt (PDF). An American Chemical Society study published in 2019 reported that “our estimates of American consumption of microplastics are likely drastic underestimates.” Scientists are still studying the health impacts of ingesting plastic—including on the immune system and in childhood development. But we do know that we’re all being exposed to plastic constantly. (Because no standards for microplastics currently exist from the American National Standards Institute, ANSI, or NSF International—two bodies that oversee product claim requirements—none of our water filter picks are certified for microplastic filtration.)

The microfibers that our clothing shed may have significant consequences for ecosystems in water and on land, as well as directly on our health—the extent of which scientists are just beginning to understand. We have a major environmental problem, and it’s linked to our clothes—how we design them, how we make them, how often we buy them, and how we care for them. “The global production of stretchy synthetic textiles is expected to triple by 2050,” said Jackson. “So this is a problem that’s not going away.”

Do laundry filters help?

There are two kinds of filters that you can buy to address microfiber shedding in laundry. The first is a filter that you add to your washing machine’s water outflow, to catch fibers before they enter municipal wastewater. The second is an accessory you throw in the wash along with your clothes, such as laundry balls that capture microfibers or laundry bags made from woven monofilaments with a small pore size.

Do they help? The short answer is maybe. A handful of studies (one of which was supported by clothing brand Eileen Fisher) demonstrate that both in-drum and external microfiber filters reduce microfiber pollution in the wastewater system to varying extents. Both types require periodic cleaning to remove the stuff that builds up, and those fibers must be thrown in the trash—not washed down the sink—to actually divert plastics from wastewater. (Of course, that plastic will then end up in landfills and, over time, may leach chemicals back into the environment. There is no perfect solution.)

At the moment, there are no standardized methods or metrics for comparing these devices, and this is why we can’t recommend a pick or definitively point to one we trust most. “Quantifying microfiber release from clothing is complex,” said Imogen Napper, a research fellow at the University of Plymouth who co-authored a study in 2020 comparing the effectiveness of six microfiber filtration devices. “It can be potentially impacted by temperature, use of detergent or conditioner, type of washing machine, type of garments washed and their polymer type.” Scientific findings may also differ from company numbers, which is not necessarily cause for distrust; this is to be expected if there is no consistent testing methodology.

That said, not all devices are equal. They differ in ease of use, cost per life cycle, transparency, and evidence-based backing. What works best is ultimately the device that has at least one third-party test behind it and that meets your lifestyle and needs.

External microfiber filters: pricier up front, require installation

A microfiber filter that you attach to the outside of your washing machine may be an option. It will require more effort than just using a laundry bag or similar accessory. But other than attaching the filter and emptying it every two to 10 loads (depending on the filter and what you wash), you won’t need to adjust how you do laundry (as you might when using laundry bags or balls). Most filters are bulky, however, so you need to make sure you have enough room for the filter you choose (and, if you rent, have approval from your landlord). For example, Filtrol ($140 at the time of writing) is 15 inches tall and 9 inches wide, and it should be installed with 1 to 2 feet of clearance above the filter (to access it for cleaning). Another option, LUV-R ($180 at the time of writing) is similar in size, at about 13 inches tall and 10 inches wide, and it requires 16 to 18 inches of top clearance.

The Girlfriend Collective Microfiber Filter is cheaper ($45 at the time of writing). But the price does not include the eight additional parts (PDF) you have to source on your own. Depending on your personality, you may find sourcing these components (like a hose, which the Filtrol and the LUV-R kits include) to be an “unbelievable hassle,” as one recent reviewer observed on Girlfriend Collective’s site. We have not yet tried the filter we purchased, but one Wirecutter staffer is planning to install it, and we will update this piece with the results.

Closeup of person holding up a Girlfriend Collective Microfiber Filter.
The Girlfriend Collective filter has to be attached (with some effort) to the outside of your washing machine to capture microfibers that are shed in the wash. Photo: Girlfriend Collective

When used correctly, the LUV-R has been shown in tests to reduce microfibers. But it’s difficult to definitively say how effective this device is, given the lack of standardized methods. A 2020 study by scientists with the International Marine Litter Research Unit, at the University of Plymouth, found that the LUV-R reduced microfibers in wastewater by 29%, plus or minus 15%. But another study published the same year found that the LUV-R reduced shedding by 74%. (Both studies sought to mimic household laundry practices.) Neither study included the Filtrol in testing, so it cannot be compared. Of six devices tested in the studyXFiltra (expected to become available soon) was found to be the most effective filter (a 78% reduction). Girlfriend Collective does not share its filter’s effectiveness. But according to its website, the company is working with a third party to provide a capture rate.

Laundry bags and balls: portable and ready to go out of the box (with some limitations)

If you have limited space around your washing machine or setup sounds like too much of a DIY project, or you rent, do laundry at a laundromat, or are on a tighter budget, you may prefer a microfiber bag (which you fill with your garments and toss in the machine) or a laundry ball (which goes into the drum with your load).

Laundry bags and laundry balls cost less than external filters, but they don’t necessarily save you money in the long run. Expect to spend between $20 to $40 per item. The Guppyfriend laundry bag (approximately 29 by 20 inches) is about $35, the Wolven bag (approximately 28 by 20 inches) is $24, and the Cora Ball is $38 (all prices at the time of writing). However, you will likely need more than one bag. Alexander Nolte, co-founder of Guppyfriend, told me that the company recommends using two bags per wash cycle, to avoid overstuffing the bag. For effective cleaning and to balance the wash cycle, each bag should ideally be filled to two-thirds its volume (what I estimated to be about 15 adult T-shirts). This essentially doubles the cost to you. There is no limit to the amount of clothing per load you can wash with the Cora Ball. However, the company does suggest adding up to two more balls if you notice many fibers being caught in a single wash cycle.

Laundry bags

A Guppyfriend laundry wash bag filled with colorful clothes.
Laundry bags like the Guppyfriend work just like other wash-cycle laundry bags: You fill the bag with your clothing and toss it into the washing machine. Photo: Guppyfriend

If you are considering getting a laundry bag, there are a few microfiber bags available, the most common being the Guppyfriend. It’s made with woven monofilament, a single polyamide filament, similar to fishing line, that does not disintegrate into fibers the way yarn does. The material gives it a smooth, almost slippery, windbreaker-like feel. It’s sold directly through the website, as well as through outdoor retailers like Patagonia and REI. As do other wash-cycle laundry bags (even those that don’t claim to reduce microplastic pollution), the Guppyfriend protects delicates in the wash. Probably because it has been available the longest, since 2017, the Guppyfriend seems to also be the most robustly tested and researched bag of any of its competitors. The 2020 University of Plymouth study found that the Guppyfriend reduced microfibers by 54%. Yet, as with any device, the actual reduction will differ based on the variables of your machine, the type and quantity of laundry, the detergent, and the cycle, among other factors.

Other laundry bags, like the Wolven bag, closely resemble the Guppyfriend and have similar sizing, but there is not as much scientific evidence available from third parties to support their claims. Will Ryan, the “chief dreamer” of Wolven (a 1% for the Planet company that sells OEKO-TEX–certified fabric), said in an email that the company designed its nylon bag with the same manufacturer “that claims to produce the Guppyfriend.” I noticed that the Guppyfriend was off-white out of the box, yet the Wolven bag was a brighter white color and had a slightly less-smooth feel than the Guppyfriend. When I asked about this difference, the spokesperson responded, “I can’t be 100% certain that it’s the same manufacturer and material, but the manufacturer claimed that it was, and when we initially compared them we didn’t feel a difference. Maybe they’ve changed their bag material more recently. Sorry that I can’t be more certain.” Coming from a company with transparency certifications, this answer struck me as a red flag. But perhaps it’s indicative of the challenges facing transparency in textiles. This doesn’t necessarily mean that the Wolven bags don’t work, but we can’t recommend their effectiveness at reducing microfiber shedding. (Mine did unzip two of the three times I used it in the wash, however, which did not happen with the Guppyfriend.)

Laundry balls

A closeup of a person placing a Cora Ball laundry ball in a washing machine filled with colorful clothing.
The Cora Ball goes directly into the wash with the load. Unlike laundry bags, which protect garments, this device may snag on loose knits or lace fabrics and damage delicate clothing. Photo: Cora Ball

The Cora Ball is the only laundry ball I found that is commercially available and marketed toward the microplastics problem. It is a grapefruit-sized, pine-cone-like plastic orb whose spines are capped with soft, doughnut-shaped plastic discs to protect your clothes from snagging. In the University of Plymouth study, of the six devices tested, the Cora Ball was the third most effective, reducing microfibers by about 31%, versus 54% for the Guppyfriend. Since neither device is perfect but both have been shown in testing to reduce microfiber shedding into wastewater, it may be more important to consider what you wash—and how.

The company does not recommend using the Cora Ball with lace fabrics or loose knits because it can snag on threads and damage delicate clothing, and the company states that items with straps, like bras, may wind their way around the ball. I haven’t yet tested the Cora Ball, but just holding it, I observed it has enough toothy components that I’d be nervous to use it for delicates. (I have personally gravitated toward using the Guppyfriend over the Cora Ball, because I use it with athletic wear and other delicates. I have not attempted to use both together since neither product was designed to be used in tandem, and it is unclear whether the agitation from the Cora Ball could affect the performance of a laundry bag.)

Other things to consider

Just as with the external microfiber filters, you’ll need to clean the laundry bags or the Cora Ball, but how frequently you do this will vary. Over time, larger strands like hair and pet fur, as well as tiny fibers, will start to accumulate in the spines of the Cora Ball or the seams of the bag. At some point, that build-up has to be removed and disposed of in the trash. Some reviewers have found cleaning these devices to be annoying. For those with limited dexterity or mobility, cleaning around the seams or plastic spines may be extra-frustrating or impossible.

Guppyfriend claims its bag will withstand at least 50 washes (or just a sixth of what Energy Star estimates the average US household washes in a year). Nolte claims Guppyfriend will likely last longer if washed as directed, with cold water. Cora Ball does not suggest replacing its device after a set number of uses, although the company does offer free spindle replacement for the first year.

All of the devices available—both external filters and in-drum bags and balls—are either mostly or 100% plastic in some form. And, in the United States at least, because these plastics are classified as “other,” they will be difficult, if not impossible, to recycle. (Guppyfriend recommends recycling the bag in Germany, where recycling practices are different. Cora Ball claims that its plastic is 100% recyclable, but US recycling practices make this more complicated.) I didn’t find any studies comparing the amount of plastic these devices contribute to landfill versus what they’re able to divert from wastewater throughout their life cycles. As of now, neither Cora Ball nor Guppyfriend offers a product reclamation program.

What can you do without a filter?

Everyone I spoke with for this piece stressed that the plastic microfiber problem cannot be solved by individuals alone, and that it will require changes across scales and industries. Some of those changes are being discussed at the state or federal level. California’s legislature, for example, is considering a bill that would identify and eventually require effective microfiber filtration in laundry facilities. In February 2020, France became the first country to require that, by 2025, new washing machines will be able to filter microplastics. And in March 2021 Australia announced, in its National Plastics Plan (PDF), a phase-in of such filters in commercial and residential washers by July 2030. Even so, Jackson said, the impact of individual practices “should not be underestimated.”

The experts I spoke with suggested a few tactics. Some of them are intuitive, like doing laundry less often and reducing the volume of water you use in proportion to fabric (because studies suggest that more water causes more microfiber shedding). This means you should wash full loads when possible and—surprisingly—avoid delicates settings, since delicates cycles use more water but less agitation. Experts also suggest using front-loading washing machines, since they are found to cause less shedding than top-loading models, and to line-dry your clothes when possible. Guppyfriend advises washing on cold—advice that is echoed elsewhere. Sam Athey washes with cold water but said the effect of warm water temps on microfiber shedding doesn’t have sufficient scientific evidence. “I know there’s not good scientific consensus to say that cold water washes reduce microfiber loss during laundry, but at the same time, I know that cold water washes are better for fluid energy consumption and that low volume washes are good for water consumption. So other environmental impacts factor into my practices as well.”

Even though all of this may be overwhelming, Athey suggested taking a pragmatic, multi-pronged approach to doing laundry. “One solution is not going to work for everyone. … It’s good to know what solutions are out there and consider adopting more than one.”

So, what can you do to reduce microfiber pollution?

  • Do laundry less often.
  • Wash full loads.
  • Avoid delicates settings on your machine.
  • Line-dry your clothes when possible.
  • Consider installing a filter on your washing machine or using a laundry bag or laundry ball.
  • When it’s time to buy a new washing machine, opt for a front-loading model.

Sources

1. Mark Anthony Browne, et al., Accumulation of Microplastic on Shorelines Worldwide: Sources and Sinks (subscription required), Environmental Science & Technology, September 6, 2011

2. Melanie Bergmann, et al., White and wonderful? Microplastics prevail in snow from the Alps to the Arctic, Science Advances, August 14, 2019

3. Sunanda Mishra, et al., Synthetic microfibers: Source, transport and their remediation (subscription required), Journal of Water Process Engineering, September 6, 2020

4. Kieran D. Cox, et al., Human Consumption of Microplastics (subscription required), Environmental Science & Technology, June 5, 2019

5. Fionn Murphy, et al., Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) as a Source of Microplastics in the Aquatic Environment (subscription required), Environmental Science & Technology, May 18, 2016

6. Imogen E. Napper and Richard C. Thompson, Release of synthetic microplastic plastic fibres from domestic washing machines: Effects of fabric type and washing conditions (subscription required), Marine Pollution Bulletin, September 26, 2016

7. Francesca De Falco, et al., Microfiber Release to Water, via Laundering, and to Air, via Everyday Use: A Comparison Between Polyester Clothing with Differing Textile Parameters (subscription required), Environmental Science & Technology, February 26, 2020

8. Mark Anthony Browne, et al., Pore-size and polymer affect the ability of filters for washing-machines to reduce domestic emissions of fibres to sewage, PLOS One, June 19, 2020

9. Imogen E. Napper, et al., The efficiency of devices intended to reduce microfiber release during clothes washing (subscription required), Science of the Total Environment, July 16, 2020

10. Max R. Kelly, et al., Importance of Water Volume on the Release of Microplastic Fibers from Laundry (subscription required), Environmental Science & Technology, August 28, 2019

11. Wirecutter

You may also like:

More articles

Disclosure: Written and researched by GetGear.tech. We spotlight services and products you would possibly find interestingWhen you purchase them, we might get a small share of the revenue from the sale from our companions. We might obtain merchandise freed from cost from producers to test. This doesn’t drive our choice as as to if or not a product is featured or advisable. We function independently from our promoting workforce. We welcome your suggestions. E-mail us at [email protected].

When you buy through our links, we may earn some money from our affiliate partners. Learn more.

Latest article

More from the category